GemologyOnline.com https://www.gemologyonline.com/Forum/phpBB2/ |
|
Fossils that are used as Gems https://www.gemologyonline.com/Forum/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=14659 |
Page 2 of 5 |
Author: | ROM [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:40 am ] | |||
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems | |||
There's another fossil material that's gaining wider attention as a gem: the opal-like ammonite shell from Canada and the northern U.S. that's trade-named Ammolite. It gets its play of color effect from unusual microstructure of the mineral aragonite. Here are two examples from several in my inventory:
|
Author: | studiogem [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
odors? ehmmm...sorry...what about coprolite then ? Stonebender wrote: VERY true Rick, it does give off a very distinct odor. No matter how well agatized it is too. I think that's one of the things that attracts me to dino bone- it actually once being a living creature. It gives you kind of a mushy, special connection with history. Not to mention it can be downright gorgeous!
Barbra Voltaire wrote: Oh, no worries....I thought that "Fossils used as Gems" would be a real interesting topic on it's own..... If you posted an opalized clam shell pseudo-morph on the opal thread it would have been a tough decision, but the dinosaur bone is now "born free". Well, in that case, I have plenty of pictures to share in this topic!! It really is a pretty good idea for it's own topic. Good idea! |
Author: | Kerensky [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
Can you bring out more detail under the microscope, Rick, or does the symmetry simply disintegrate? |
Author: | ROM [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
Kerensky wrote: Can you bring out more detail under the microscope, Rick, or does the symmetry simply disintegrate? I'm not sure which stone you're referring to Owen. In any event I'm not a microscopist although I'm sure additional detail in dinosaur bone would be revealed with magnification. One thing I've noticed is some considerable variation in bone cell sizes. Most of my pieces exhibit cells in the approx. 1 to 1.5 mm. size but I have one lovely red slab that requires 10X magnification to make out the cell structure. I'm not clear why that should be unless such size variation existed in the bones of the actual living creature. |
Author: | ROM [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
studiogem wrote: odors? ehmmm...sorry...what about coprolite then ? I knew this comment was coming. Why don't you experiment with that and give us a report? I've never actually cut any coprolitic material. |
Author: | TRH2011 [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
Thats really interesting stuff. It takes a nice polish too! I wanted to go to denver so bad this year but couldnt. I am jealous . |
Author: | Kerensky [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
ROM wrote: Kerensky wrote: Can you bring out more detail under the microscope, Rick, or does the symmetry simply disintegrate? I'm not sure which stone you're referring to Owen. In any event I'm not a microscopist although I'm sure additional detail in dinosaur bone would be revealed with magnification. One thing I've noticed is some considerable variation in bone cell sizes. Most of my pieces exhibit cells in the approx. 1 to 1.5 mm. size but I have one lovely red slab that requires 10X magnification to make out the cell structure. I'm not clear why that should be unless such size variation existed in the bones of the actual living creature. Sorry, I was actually thinking about the symmetry in the coral structure. With regard to the dinosaur bone, am I in trouble too over the word 'cell'? My understanding is that a 'cell' in the biological sense are microscopically small and are the smallest arrangement of complex chemical compounds to capable of independent life (as in single-celled organisms). I guess, you must be talking about the relatively huge and irregularly spaced and shaped voids in bone that make bone light and provide 'factory floor space' for living cells that repair, replace, fight infection etc? |
Author: | ROM [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
Kerensky wrote: I guess, you must be talking about the relatively huge and irregularly spaced and shaped voids in bone that make bone light and provide 'factory floor space' for living cells that repair, replace, fight infection etc? Yes, I'm sure you're right about that. I fell unthinkingly into the popular jargon one hears around U.S. gem shows, etc. Those voids would be the the natural places to be filled by silica during fossilization. And that probably answers my earlier question about size differences. The size of the voids would vary depending on bone density. |
Author: | Osman khattak [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:07 pm ] | ||||
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems | ||||
"Fossils that are used as Gems" indeed is an interesting topic. It will help to share the knowledge of fossils gems. HUK
|
Author: | Kerensky [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
ROM wrote: .... Those voids would be the the natural places to be filled by silica during fossilization. And that probably answers my earlier question about size differences. The size of the voids would vary depending on bone density. As an enthusiastic hunter for over 50 years, I've looked at a wide variety of smashed bones and the bone density seems to vary mainly according to the stresses that the bone must bear. Within a single species, skulls (e.g.) are much more porous than shin bones I understand too that loss of bone density is one hazard of spaceflights lasting more than a matter of days as, when the body is weightless, the rate of bone replacement slows markedly. Though most whales are massively larger then (say) deer, the density of their spinal vertabrae (almost like pumice) is much lower than that of deer. Probably, this is because for whales the downwards force of gravity is pretty closely balanced by the upwards force of their buoyancy in water. It would be interesting to know if this observation might help the separation of the bones of land-living dinosaurs from the like bones of those which were water-living, on the basis of relative bone porosity in specimens of approximately the same mass |
Author: | Stonebender [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
I think "cell" isn't necessarily referring to the literal biological sense. Think more like a 'singular, closed-off space' sense of the word- like a prison cell, or photo cell, referring to the irregularly shaped spaces of color with boundaries of a thin "webbing". Like these definitions for the word 'cell': 1. any of various small compartments or bounded areas forming part of a whole. 2. a small group acting as a unit within a larger organization: a local cell of the Communist party. I don't know if that was an issue worth clearing up, or if you were just posing a rhetoric statement, Kerensky. |
Author: | Kerensky [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 4:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
Cutting to the chase, I'd be interested learn whether a differing size of voids in dino bones of similar function can help determine whether or not the dino was aquatic. As to the organisation of covert political organisations under centralised command and control, I'll go elsewhere to discuss that |
Author: | TRH2011 [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 4:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
^ nice question! Would that matter with the cells in bones if its aquatic? I would have thought it would only matter of it was a flying dino (more air in bones = less weight). But I know NOTHING about animal biology, just find it interesting. |
Author: | ROM [ Thu Oct 06, 2011 4:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Fossils that are used as Gems |
Stonebender wrote: I think "cell" isn't necessarily referring to the literal biological sense. I'd agree with you if we weren't discussing a fossilized biological material. In my mind, at least, the use of the word "cell" in relation to dinosaur bone connotes a biological cell, not a "guest room" at San Quentin. |
Page 2 of 5 | All times are UTC - 4 hours |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |