Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:19 pm Posts: 590 Location: Las Vegas, NV
SinCity wrote:
I think the "opals" are too big for the supporting matrix. My vote is that the "opals" are synthetic however I wouldn't complain if I had those "opals".
disclaimer- I live in Las Vegas which is probably second in per capita synthetic opals
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 1:19 am Posts: 370 Location: Pakistan
Stonebender wrote:
SinCity wrote:
I think the "opals" are too big for the supporting matrix. My vote is that the "opals" are synthetic however I wouldn't complain if I had those "opals".
disclaimer- I live in Las Vegas which is probably second in per capita synthetic opals
HaHa Good one!
sight identifying is never recommended in gemology so shouldn't there be a comparative analysis of synthetic against real opals .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum