Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:29 pm Posts: 321 Location: Los Angeles, CA
ok i've only been using Helicon after trying Zerene and not liking it. i've tried PS and i didn't like the results either. for the reason that Oscar already stated in this thread my stacks stay under 35 - so far. what i can ADD to this conversation is this i'm friendly with a archival/museum photo printer here in LA and he told me to always work with PSDs. when i got the same opinion from another printer, i decided to stick to this workflow: RAW>Lightroom>PSD>Helicon>PSD>LR/PS>PSD
when i did this, my stacks out of Helicon looked way better than: 1)converting the RAWs to PSDs using PS (then Helicon) 2)no conversion, RAWs Helicon
if you want to do an experiment, try that. 1) try stacking RAWs. 2) then stack the same RAWs converted to PSDs by PS. 3) then the same RAWs converted to PSDs by LR.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum