Rubies with partially healed and filled fissures.

GIA is providing cutting edge research articles on many current gemological topics.

Moderators: Stephen Challener, Barbra Voltaire, FGG, Alberto

Post Reply
User avatar
vincent pardieu
Gemology Online Veteran
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:06 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Rubies with partially healed and filled fissures.

Post by vincent pardieu »

Dear all,

I would like to inform you that we have released today a new study on the Lab research Ongoing page of www.giathai.net

http://www.giathai.net/Mozambique_Ruby_ ... _Issue.php

The study will be also very soon on the "News from the Research" page in www.gia.edu

http://www.gia.edu/research-resources/n ... index.html

The study is about the treatment using flux (in this case borax and silica) of rubies from the new deposit near Montepuez in Mozambique.
Since the end on 2009 we have started a collaboration with a Thai burner working on the heat treatment of this material.
Also at about the same time we started to see in our labs (in New York, Carlsbad and Bangkok) some flux heated rubies with fissures only partially healed. The unhealed fissures were filled with glass. No lead was found in the glass filling these wide fissures, nevertheless this is still a glass and thus this is a problem for the durability of the stone as glass (containing lead, bismuth or not) will get damaged much more rapidly that ruby as it is more sensitive to chemicals, heat and abbrasion.
At the end of March 2010, as such stones were becoming more common, we have decided to add a special comment on our reports for such cases.

For more details, I invite you to download and read the following study:

http://www.giathai.net/Mozambique_Ruby_ ... _Issue.php

Hoping that this will interest you,

All the best,
Vincent Pardieu

www.fieldgemology.org
www.conservationgemology.org

The views expressed here are V. Pardieu’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of GIA Laboratory Bangkok ([url]http://www.giathai.net[/url])where he is an employee since Dec 2008.
Christopher P. Smith
Valued Contributor
Posts: 119
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:36 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by Christopher P. Smith »

Hello Vincent, a nice piece of work. For those readers who may not already be aware of this material, this "latest ruby treatment" has been entering the trade in large numbers for about 1 year now. How to disclose this material has been a major concern for the industry. AGL released last week its initial findings and the disclosure wording that we apply for the two main types: i.e. those rubies where predominantly fissures have been healed and those rubies that possess the dual characteristics of fissure healing and glass in-filling. Our release and extra information may be found on our homepage at www.aglgemlab.com

Best regards to all,
Christopher P. Smith
User avatar
vincent pardieu
Gemology Online Veteran
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:06 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Post by vincent pardieu »

Hi Chris,
Thanks for your nice comment.

From what I understand, the treatment by itself is not really new, it seems that this is more or less the same treatment (Flux-assisted heat treatment) performed on Mong hsu rubies for nearly 20 years. Nevertheles what is new is possibly the ruby material (From Montepuez, Mozambique) used in the stones we studyed presenting these features.

In the case of Mong Hsu flux healed stones, most of the time the issue was about glass filled cavities more than glass filled fissures. Here on the other hand we see commonly glass filled fissures, which was not common with the Mong Hsu material. This is possibly due to the fact that the Montepuez ruby material, which looks to be the material with these issues, has its own specificities and may be the treatment parameters should be adjusted...

Most of the flux healed stones (from Mong Hsu, Vietnam, Afghanistan,...) send to the laboratory in the past were usually cleaned with acid before to be submitted to the lab. This is obviously not the case with many stones we saw more and more regularly since Winter 2009.
Thus we have decided about 2 months ago to adapt our nomenclature to this specific issue.

It seems that AGL and GIA have a similar approach on that issue, which is nice.

All the best,
Vincent Pardieu

www.fieldgemology.org
www.conservationgemology.org

The views expressed here are V. Pardieu’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of GIA Laboratory Bangkok ([url]http://www.giathai.net[/url])where he is an employee since Dec 2008.
User avatar
Alberto
Site Admin
Posts: 7530
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 11:24 am
Location: Sugar Land, Texas
Contact:

Post by Alberto »

VERY informative report Vincent, WELL DONE!!! :D
compliments to mr. Thawatchai Somjainuek too, hope that more burner will follow soon his collaboration path.. :D

ciao
alberto
GemmoRaman-532 - GemmoFTIR - GemmoSphere - EXA
User avatar
empress
Gold Member
Posts: 1117
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Post by empress »

Thank you.

Mostly I have no idea what the science means, but this is more than helpful.

:lol:
Soil is not dirt.
http://hmmdesign.net
User avatar
thresh
Valued Contributor
Posts: 175
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:53 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Post by thresh »

Wow.. great article! Thank you for loving gemology enough to provide all of us with a wealth of information!

Heh, this is like you're own private forum! Every non-archived thread was started by you! It says something about your research (and it says something good I think!).
User avatar
vincent pardieu
Gemology Online Veteran
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:06 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Post by vincent pardieu »

thresh wrote:Wow.. great article! Thank you for loving gemology enough to provide all of us with a wealth of information!

Heh, this is like you're own private forum! Every non-archived thread was started by you! It says something about your research (and it says something good I think!).
You are welcome.

LOL, It is not really a private sub-forum... everybody is welcome to post here. It is just that it happen that I'm (among other things) the webmaster for www.giathai.net and thus I'm usually very well informed when we put a new study online there.
As I'm visiting regularly this interesting forum, I try not to forget to invite people in this forum to go to read this research reports. But this is very non-official, of course.

All the best,

Vincent
Vincent Pardieu

www.fieldgemology.org
www.conservationgemology.org

The views expressed here are V. Pardieu’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of GIA Laboratory Bangkok ([url]http://www.giathai.net[/url])where he is an employee since Dec 2008.
User avatar
Alberto
Site Admin
Posts: 7530
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 11:24 am
Location: Sugar Land, Texas
Contact:

Post by Alberto »

Hey Tresh,
thresh wrote:Wow.. great article! Thank you for loving gemology enough to provide all of us with a wealth of information!
This is the main reason that pushed our Admin team to develop a special area where all the outstanding reports released by Vincent and his GIA collegues can be collected and commented without the risk of spreading them in other sections were they could be easily moved in older pages as the new contribute are added. 8)

ciao
alberto
GemmoRaman-532 - GemmoFTIR - GemmoSphere - EXA
Post Reply

Return to “GIA Current Research ”