New Mineral Named After GIA’s John Koivula
Welcome to the GemologyOnline.com Forum
A non-profit Forum for the exchange of gemological ideas
It is currently Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:14 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:20 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:42 pm
Posts: 2849
Location: Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
It probably means that it's made mostly for export :lol:

I think the 'mum association with funerals is of Italian origin, and since my little bit of France belonged to Italy at one time, that's probably where they got that from. I'll have to ask about where that came from one of these days.

Everyone else seems to think they are good luck, or a positive of some sort.



http://www.flowers.org.uk/plants/plantfacts/mum.htm
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:o8iJHgvXehwJ:www.baacks.com/thelanguageofflowers/list.nhtml+chrysanthemum+meaning&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=10


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 19853
Location: San Francisco
Sidebar: I'm sure you will all agree that it was very difficult identifying the stones based on the inclusions within them. But, if we had an RI, SG and polariscope/conoscope reaction, we could have all ID'd those stones on the first round.
Why am I brining this up?
Because we have often been taught to immediately check the stone with magnification in order to identify it. As you can see by this quiz, it may be the last thing to check in order to ID a gem.
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:58 am 
Offline
Gemology Online Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:03 pm
Posts: 606
Location: Sweden
Only too true, Barbra.

Still, you can usually get some really useful clues from just looking at a stone with the loupe if you can see the whole of the stone, a feeling for its hardness, whether it is isotropic or anisotropic in a coloured stone, what kind of fracture and eventual cleavage the stone has (stones that has been around more than ten days from the cutting factory usually have small damages), the amount of birefringence etc.

Btw; I got the GT now and it is really a great software! Easy to use and with huge amount of good info! Thank you very much, Bill! :smt042

_________________
If it sounds good, then say it again!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:22 pm 
Offline
Gemology Online Übergod
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 3530
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA
Ack, not Imperial. :oops:

I shouldn't have been so specific. ;)

Thank you for awarding me the joint win anyway!!! :smt023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 4 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Gemology Style ported to phpBB3 by Christian Bullock