I'm sure there are a ton of variables to contend with, to fully explain the question above, right?
It depends on the testing equipment being used, I'm sure, as well as the sample in question.
Or is the same basic equation used across all minerals/gems, regardless of its type?
What percentage of an element in a gem/mineral makes it considered a major constituent, as opposed to a minor.
Hypothetical Example: ....let's say anything under <0.01% is considered trace, and any element measured over that amount is considered a "minor/major element".(the cut off), then will that "cut off" be the same for ....say....beryl, or garnet, or zoisite, etc., as is for tourmaline?
I seen some folks use only "Major" and "trace", to describe things(scholastic papers), with no "minor" mentioned at all. Sometimes it doesn't require the extra distinction, I guess.
Are all species of mineral governed by the same "cut off", is part of what I'm trying to understand.
How many types of testing methods/machines, those commonly used in the major labs and university's, can test and make the distinction between trace and major/minor elements?
I hope it makes sense....sometimes I can't put pen to pad like I want to.